Hello and welcome to Kate Beckinsale Online! This is a fan site dedicated to the extremely talented and incredibly beautiful British actress Kate Beckinsale. Kate has been in 30+ movies in her career, you may of of Kate from the following movies: "Underworld" as Selene, "Van Helsing" as Anna Valerious, "The Aviator" as Ava Gardner, "Serendipity" as Sarah Thomas, "Pearl Harbor" as Nurse Lt. Evelyn Johnson, "Nothing But the Truth" as Rachel Armstrong, "Brokedown Palace" as Darlene Davis, plus many more! Kate Beckinsale Online is here to keep you up to date with all things Kate Beckinsale. You can access the site at Kate-Beckinsale.com and KBeckinsale.net. Please enjoy your visit here at Kate Beckinsale Online and be sure to come back soon!
Informal poll
Posted by Lisa • On June 24, 2010 • 12 Responses

I am undecided on what to do about something on the site so I thought I would ask for visitor input.  It has to do with candid photos.  Like a lot of people, I do enjoy seeing my favorite celebs in their day to day life – it makes them more “real”. However, a few of my celebs that I run sites for have been very outspoken on how much the paparazzi attention makes them uncomfortable and unhappy.  This has made me hesitant to post candids on all of my sites.  To my knowledge, Kate has never publicly said she hates the paparazzi and in any candid photos I’ve seen of her she doesn’t seem to mind.  But I am still unsure… especially when it comes to posting photos of her with Lily.

So I ask you loyal Kate Beckinsale Online visitors, what do you think?  Should I make the site paparazzi free? Should I continue posting candids? Should I only post candids that don’t have Lily in them?  Please take a few moments out of your day and leave your thoughts as a comment.


12 Responses to “Informal poll”

Annika Says:
June 24th, 2010 at 7:21 am

I vote for paparazzi free or at least no paparazzi shots with Lily in them. If people want to look at Kate candids there are enough places to do so online.

Nic Says:
June 24th, 2010 at 2:13 pm

I say stick to events where Kate is working {premieres, award shows, movie sets, parties etc.} The pictures where she is being stalked, with her kid in tow, are tacky, imo. It’s up to you, though. The pics are already out there so…

Btw, Lisa, thanks for answering my question in one of the other threads. Sorry if this is a stupid question but, do you own both this part of the site and the forum?

Terra Says:
June 24th, 2010 at 4:16 pm

The more candids the better.. because I need all the kate I can get.. Please post all that you have.

also awesome job taking over the site. I dearly missed the updates.

blofeld Says:
June 24th, 2010 at 4:29 pm

Whatever you think is best. The candids will get posted in the paparazzi thread in the forum. So if anyone wants to see them, they can go there. I see no reason to post paps photos on the main site.

Miss P Says:
June 24th, 2010 at 4:58 pm

I don’t know. I will always check the paparazzi pics and frankly the celebs who relly don’t want them don’t have them, no matter how famous they are (I’ve seen maybe two blurry pics of Johnny Depp’s kids in the last ten years).

Right now the candids are being posted in the forum and I think it’s fine if it is allowed to remain this way and not be published on the main site. They are still easy to find for those who want them, and are all in one place dedicated to Kate. But they shouldn’t be banned completely, a fan community is incomplete if we have to go look somewhere else for some pictures.
There are enough places to find them online, yes, but none where there are all of them and where people put in common several sources to have the most comprehensive set of pics possible. There are also other places to look at red carpet pictures online. Isn’t a fansite supposed to be the place to find the best info and pics?

Brian Says:
June 24th, 2010 at 7:30 pm

I don’t think we ever added paparazzi pics with Lily on the main site’s gallery. On the forum, we used to have a policy about not adding candids with Lily, but that was difficult to enforce.

I would vote against adding candids with Lily to the site’s gallery. As far as with Kate only, that depends on how often you want to update the gallery. Sometimes there will be plenty of event pics, but there will be dry spells also. I think having pap pics in the forum is enough, they probably don’t need to be added to the site gallery..

Luciana Says:
July 3rd, 2010 at 7:37 pm

I vote for Paparazzi Free.

Carl Says:
July 4th, 2010 at 11:53 pm

I vote for paparazzi:yes, Lily:no.

Kate openly courts the paparazzi for publicity (i.e. She dresses too well for trips to In-n-Out Burger), and I don’t have a problem with those photos. The ones with Lily should be left out, she’s a minor and doesn’t seek a public life.

The Doctor Says:
July 6th, 2010 at 5:04 am

Not fussed, though if one posted and then told others in the forum from same series, would be good I guess.

Tori Says:
July 11th, 2010 at 3:31 pm

I vote pap free, everyone deserves to have a little bit of privacy and posting photos of the kids is kinda tacky, they’re just kids who aren’t always able to say no to that yet. Your site is so good without them.

lisa Says:
July 29th, 2010 at 6:55 pm

candids photos are good

Forick Says:
August 10th, 2010 at 2:42 am

I vote it to be free as well. I believe she feels fine/don’t mind taking photo’s when it’s appropriate but not when she’s on the move – she looks uncomfortable.